The Good Old Days: A Tale of Strategic Success
As an IT systems and security engineer, I've learned countless lessons through on-the-job experience. One lesson that sticks with me is how much things have changed over time, especially regarding the balance between strategic planning and tactical execution.
Many years ago, as a rookie engineer, I was tasked with configuring and deploying 3Com switches (Thick Ethernet) and Apple desktops for all the courthouses in our county; we had time—time to strategize, plan, and execute. Our team was well-rounded, filled with expertise, and able to collaborate directly with our customers. We planned our tactical efforts carefully and communicated clearly, and despite some of the manual work involved, we were successful. That success didn’t come from having the right tools but from having a clear strategy and a strong, cohesive team. The result? A satisfied customer and a project completed efficiently and precisely with a stress-free team.
The Vendor Tool Explosion: A Double-Edged Sword
Fast forward to today, and the cybersecurity landscape has dramatically shifted. The past five to ten years have seen an explosion of vendor tools expanding beyond the horizon. While this proliferation offers more solutions, it's created new challenges:
1. Hasty adoptions: Organizations rush to implement tools without proper strategy.
2. Understaffed deployments: Complex tools are often left to implement a single engineer.
3. Skill gaps: Many new tools lack user-friendly interfaces or comprehensive documentation.
4. Limited training: Vendors often provide shallow knowledge bases or sparse technical documents.
5. Little Integration: Tools from different vendors rarely communicate effectively, creating silos of information and increasing complexity.
The Reality of Vendor Support and Skill Gaps
Unfortunately, many vendors offer minimal support, providing only shallow learning courses or essential technical documents. This leaves the deployment engineer scrambling to figure out how to implement the tool and make it work in the real world. The result? Burnout, frustration, and chaos as engineers juggle multiple tools, each with its learning curve, quirks, and pitfalls.
In addition, the emphasis on tools over teams is evident. Organizations are investing in products without equally investing in the skilled professionals needed to implement and maintain them effectively. This imbalance between tooling and talent is a recipe for disaster in the long term.
The 'Use It or Lose It' Mentality
One factor contributing to this tactical overload is the "use it or lose it" budget mentality. I've re-encountered this pressure time and time. Departments finally secure the budget to invest in new solutions, but there's a rush to spend that money quickly, often without proper planning. This drive to deploy tools before the budget disappears only exacerbates the problem, forcing engineers to hurry through the process with little time to consider the long-term impact.
The Danger of Tactical Hell
This brings us to what I call "Tactical Hell." It’s a situation where security engineers and IT teams find themselves endlessly reacting, provisioning, and fixing rather than proactively strategizing and planning. I’ve heard too many times: "Let’s just baseline the tool now, and we’ll improve it later." But how often do we get to Phase 2?
You know the frustration if you’ve ever found yourself in these scenarios. You understand the challenges of being stuck in a cycle of tactical firefighting instead of focusing on the larger strategic picture.
The Case for Strategic Planning
So, how do we escape this Tactical Hell? The solution lies in a return to strategic planning. We must give our teams the time, resources, and space to plan effectively, choose the right tools, and build a thoughtful, long-term approach to security architecture. When the right people are selected, and a clear strategy is in place, the tactical challenges shrink, and the focus shifts to doing things right from the beginning.
Your Turn: Share Your Experience
Have you found yourself trapped in similar scenarios?
How have you dealt with the pressure to deploy tools quickly without proper planning?
Share your experiences and strategies in the comments below. Let's collectively discuss improving our cybersecurity tool deployment and management approach. Together, we can find a way out of Tactical Hell and towards a more strategic, practical future.
Survivor of Tactical Hell, Art Chavez
Still wondering why Phase 2 never happens...
Join us, and let us work together: https://www.isaunited.org/isaunited-architecture-sos
References:
1. Burnout in Cybersecurity: Many cybersecurity professionals experience burnout due to operational complexity and high demands from managing multiple tools. Studies show that 79% of cybersecurity professionals report burnout, often driven by tool overload and high stress levels. These issues are compounded by insufficient vendor support, which leaves teams scrambling to implement tools effectively.Source: SecureWorld
2. Challenges with Vendor Tools: A 2023 cybersecurity report found that more than half of organizations experienced challenges with their security tools. These issues include complexity, poor integration across environments, and overwhelming alerts. The lack of comprehensive vendor support further contributes to operational difficulties.Source: Bitdefender 2023 Cybersecurity Assessment
3. Lack of Strategic Planning: Many security teams are forced into a tactical mindset due to budget constraints and the rush to deploy tools. Studies show that these quick adoptions often lead to tactical chaos without the time or resources for strategic planning. Over 50% of professionals stated that their tools did not meet initial expectations.Source: ISACA Report on Cybersecurity and Burnout